{"id":25851,"date":"2022-03-30T23:26:58","date_gmt":"2022-03-30T21:26:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.camaeleon.org\/?p=25851"},"modified":"2022-05-04T00:17:50","modified_gmt":"2022-05-03T22:17:50","slug":"der-debating-contest-am-dfg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.camaeleon.org\/en\/2022\/03\/30\/der-debating-contest-am-dfg\/","title":{"rendered":"Debating Contest at DFG"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n
\"Debating
Foto: Ernst \/ Cam\u00e4l\u00e9on<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Exactly one week ago, the Debating Contest took place at our school for the first time in two years. All six Seconde classes of DFG sent three representatives to a debate in which two classes competed against each other. Out of the six classes, there were a total of 2 winners who will compete in a final.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Procedure<\/h6>\n
<\/div>\n
Two classes competed against each other. The three representatives sat opposite each other at a 90\u00b0 angle, facing their own classes and the jury. The jury consisted of Mrs. Roig, an American student Donovan Murray-Guinn and the director of the German-American Institute Saarland, Dr. Bruno von Lutz.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
After a presentation time of the arguments of both teams (pro and con) of 2 minutes, both teams had a consultation time of 5 minutes. Then the debate took place: 20 minutes. The Pro team always started. At the end of this time, there were another two minutes to formulate a summary and a conclusion.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n